🔗 Share this article

Itranspired the manager could survive losing against Grimsby. He weathered losing a crucial continental showpiece versus one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He withstood home defeats to West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, squandering the team's most promising homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to engage. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a top-flight right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim took on the executive and seems to have failed. The most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a manager who frequently berated his squad for failing in one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of one of England's top division's most feared sporting directors.

In truth, this whole painful saga appears to portray the director in a different perspective. It may have been easy, given his nine months of experience with the Saints, to regard Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position largely to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How mistaken we all were. By masterfully outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of football's true generals: a tactical intellect that United’s competitors will now be justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Clash Regarding Formation & Philosophy

To illustrate, this was the director , after having been part of the leadership that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim in the first place, was instrumental in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas were resisted. But perhaps such directives hold greater authority when issued from the mouth of a man the impeccable soccer background he possesses, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually he might agree to explain his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is walking away with full compensation, without any compensation reduction clause activated. The director speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – men like him – function on a plane exceeding our mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, probably we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not quite the same as being prepared to receive.

An Ultimate Power Behind the Throne

Naturally, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the directives of his ultimate superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his desire for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to embrace data science and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting early in his minority ownership, he announced that United’s style of play “shall be determined by this group”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate football matters, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Above all he remains incredibly rich, and as we all know, the wealthy are the best of us: more insightful, sagacious, strategically brilliant, fundamentally superior. Whom else would you trust to oversee a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a modern arena that looks similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of a new striker?

A New Soccer Hierarchy: Executives Over Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated major sporting choices to low-level employees like managers, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously possible for a young, innovative manager with a philosophy and drive to join a club and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many companies have these guys established? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Better by far to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the strategy by the directors and hire a coach who will adapt their methods to suit. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to delivery personnel: not responsible for the food, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives poorly or leaks out of the box.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they can do little to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and secures two medium-sized trophies, and essentially gets sacked for speaking out. A manager at Celtic finds his standing damaged whereas the people who hired him continue to make errors another day.

A Modern Corporate Game: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And possibly in a small way this is simply neoliberalism in action: the elevation of a privileged overclass who are infallible, whose decisions are always untouchable, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to fire him for playing too much that system. Bring in the project manager and then discard him for taking excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for the latest summer signings, for the fact that the adults – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.